good

1, omeley
2,fitz (to olod to play 80 mins)

bad

1, turner
2, long
3, lauaki
4, moa
5,dowes (he re-signed him)
6,sharp (looked like a donkey tonight)
7,westerman

Harsh to judge players on two games and Moa has been a good signing, albeit badly used.

what bollox....sharp had aright go tonight...have to disagree with that...what do you expect him to do when all they do is drive down the middle...thort obst had a go..westerman was average for me though...

BAD
Lauaki is to much of a liability,
Dowes (not seen enough of him, doesnt seem to man up from the little ive seen of him)
Sharp very very poor tonight (but might have something to do with manu playing centre, and him needing to push inside?)

GOOD
Westerman - Poor again but not settled in yet and imo will come good.
Long-was always going to be a bit part player and is here to coach the youngersters coming through more then anything else.
Moa & Turner deserved to be signed and have shown enough.
O'meley - your best player.
Fitzy - you say cant play 80mins but Agar says hes one of the fittest in the squad, if not the best. Ill take Agars opinion as hes seen him more then you have.

Just look at your recent signings, you have Phelps practically begging for a job on the internet and then there is Obst who is at least your 3rd choice well behind Chase and Sammutt. Not good at all.

Being harsh on Sharp IMO. The lad took the ball from dummy half a hell of a lot tonight and put int he hard graft when others were not so forthcoming. The fact he had Manu as his centre will not have helped either.

Quite right, he fulfilled the role of an 'Agar-Type' winger fine IMO. We'll only know if he's actually any good when we get a proper coach in.

Thought he took 3 or 4 wrong options to be fair like coming for the bomb as an example but that's the least of our worries.