It’s not just what goes on, on the pitch, it’s to do with peaking the players at the right time.

Peet mentioned a few times during the off season they would look to peak for the WCC game. Training would be different more intense and demanding over a sustained period of weeks prior to that game much different to how they would normally go into a season.

It’s possible to peak 2-3 times over the course of the season. With all things after a peak there needs to be a trough to assist recovery and get the bodies back on track.

I think training intensity will have dropped off for the last few weeks post Penrith which is reflected in our lethargic performances.

I think it will have been ramped up again, but not to pre Penrith levels, prior to this match.

I think we will have looked at the fixtures post Penrith and used it as a deliberate active recovery period post the WCC.

For Byrne that is.

The MRP isnt fit for purpose and we all know that

For what it's worth, I think the only challenge out of the 3 in question that had any form of intent for dirty play is the one that didn't get a ban. For me, that sums up the current mess.

Byrne had zero intent for a high tackle - 4 match ban.
Lees had no intent to bang heads with Thompson (despite the nonsense on here from someone suggesting it wasn't accidental) - 2 game ban.
Dupree deliberately elbows Lees - nothing.

Strip away the shambolic system we have; if Byrne and Lees didn't get bans this weekend and Dupree did, I genuinely don't think any RL Supporter of any club would complain.

Accidents aren't allowed to happen anymore according to the RFL disciplinary and it's all about end result. All the proof we need in regards to that is that Byrne gets 4 games for accidental contact, whereas Franklin Pele gets 3 games after opening night for trying to smash Minchella in to next month with a forearm/fist smash to the face. Intent seemingly doesn't come in to things and that's all part of the lottery it's become.

The Dupree one clearly wasn't an accident but what I will say is that the motion of what he does is to try and offer himself some form of protection. That sort of action has been getting on my nerves for a couple of years however and it's dangerous. I'd have given him one game for it tbh (and gone back and retrospectively given Matty Lees 37 games for the times he's done it this past few seasons...sorry, couldn't resist )

This.

I just wish one, or a few clubs collaborating, pushed back against the MRP in someway.